Vern Evans
With the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service poised to shoot more than 450,000 invasive barred owls in West Coast forests as part of a controversial Biden-era strategy to protect the threatened northern spotted owl, a bipartisan group of 19 lawmakers sent a plea to the Trump administration Monday to stand down.
In a letter addressed to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, the legislators called the agency’s effort expensive, morally questionable, and potentially ineffective.
Troy Nehls, a Texas Republican, and Sydney Kamlager-Dove, a California Democrat, initiated the move, and 17 additional Congress members added their signatures to the rebuke, including nine Democrats and eight Republicans.
“By extrapolating costs for prior kills of owls, conducted on a small scale, this plan would require $1.35 billion over the course of thirty years to hunt and kill one owl species to the benefit of another,” the letter stated.
The USFWS lethal culling program would authorize trained shooters from government agencies, private companies, local landowners, and Native American Tribes “to enter obscure forest areas to kill nearly half a million barred owls.”
In essence, each bird would cost U.S. taxpayers $3,000.
The letter also pointed out that there is little precedent for success in a culling program this extensive. Programs that did have positive outcomes occurred in island ecosystems or other areas with natural barriers, not the 24-acre patchwork of lands proposed in the USFWS plan to protect spotted owls.
Another flaw in the plan is that barred owls are a native North American species protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act for more than 100 years. Although they are not native to West Coast forests, they have expanded their range naturally. The animals are native to eastern North America and didn’t first appear in the Pacific Northwest until the 1970s.
“To claim that animals are invasive because they expand their range denies dynamism in ecological systems,” the letter stated.
One theory for the barred owl’s Westward expansion is that environmental changes caused by European settlement altered the natural landscape, removing natural barriers and providing a corridor for them to reach the spotted owl’s natural habitat. Today, barred owls outnumber their spotted cousins in portions of the latter’s historic range. Research suggests that declines in spotted owl populations are more pronounced in areas where barred owls have taken up residence.
The USFWS finalized its non-native barred owl management strategy in August 2024 and included the lethal removal of barred owls with non-lead ammunition after attracting the birds with recorded calls in California, Oregon, and Washington. The agency has not announced a specific launch date for barred owl removal under the new strategy. However, a final proposal is expected to be announced sometime in the spring or summer of 2025.
Killing barred owls for conservation is nothing new. Approximately 4,500 of them have been removed through lethal methods since 2009, according to Robin Brown, the USFWS barred owl strategy leader. However, the culling project would expand significantly under the USFWS’s final Barred Owl Management Strategy.
The USFWS has listed the northern spotted owl as a threatened species in accordance with the Endangered Species Act since 1990. Early efforts to save the bird and its rapidly disappearing old-growth forest habitat rocked the timber industry in the early 1990s. The chocolate-brown spotted owl became a cultural symbol of environmental conflict.
Conservationists argued that protecting old-growth forests was crucial to the spotted owl’s survival as a species, while the timber industry contended that restrictions threatened jobs and local economies. The drama surrounding the bird’s struggle for survival pitted against the timber industry resulted in protestors forming human blockades and chaining themselves to logging equipment.
Read Next: Why Do Turkeys Gobble at Owls?
The press coverage the protestors garnered for the little spotted owl helped usher in Bill Clinton’s Northwest Forest Plan. Initiated in 1993, the plan aimed to balance economic needs with environmental protection, significantly reducing timber sales on federal lands in the Pacific Northwest. Although Clinton’s plan protected most of the spotted owl’s older forest habitat and saw a net increase of over 1 million acres of additional habitat in the first decade, spotted owl populations continued to plummet at even greater rates than expected in its northern range.
Read the full article here