Andrew Wakefield’s “Callous Disregard”: A Provocative Call To Reexamine Vaccine Safety And Parental Warnings

This article was originally published by Kevin Hughes at Natural News. 

• • Andrew Wakefield is a polarizing figure in the debate over autism and vaccines, viewed by some as a whistleblower and by others as a discredited researcher. His book “Callous Disregard” reignites the controversy, emphasizing his claims of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism.

• • Wakefield highlights the experiences of parents who believe their children developed autism and gastrointestinal issues after receiving the MMR vaccine. He amplifies their voices, which he argues are often marginalized in the broader scientific and regulatory discourse.

• • The book critiques the safety evaluation of vaccines, particularly the MMR vaccine, citing concerns raised by Dr. Peter Fletcher, a former UK medical officer. Fletcher questions the rigor of vaccine safety assessments and highlights gaps in regulatory oversight, such as the advisory nature of vaccine committees.

• • Wakefield presents detailed clinical cases, including Child PH, to argue for a causal link between the MMR vaccine and autism. He also discusses “positive rechallenge” cases, where re-exposure to the vaccine worsened symptoms, as evidence supporting his claims.

• • “Callous Disregard” urges a more cautious approach to vaccine administration and calls for greater attention to parental reports and adverse reactions. The book challenges readers to reconsider vaccine safety protocols and engage with the complexities of the autism-vaccine debate.

In the highly charged debate over the link between autism and vaccines, few figures elicit as strong a reaction as Andrew Wakefield. His book “Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines—The Truth Behind a Tragedy” has once again thrust him into the spotlight, dividing opinions and stirring passionate responses from both supporters and critics.

This exploration of Wakefield’s work aims to unpack the complex arguments and personal stakes involved, offering a nuanced look at a topic that continues to impact countless lives.

Wakefield is no stranger to controversy. To some, he is a courageous whistleblower who dared to challenge the medical establishment; to others, he is a discredited figure whose claims have been debunked and whose actions have been deemed unethical.

The core of the book delves into the science and regulation surrounding vaccines, particularly the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine. In a letter included in the preface, Dr. Peter Fletcher, a former principal medical officer in the U.K., raises critical questions about the vaccine’s safety. Fletcher points out that the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization was purely advisory and lacked the power to grant or refuse product licenses, highlighting a potential gap in the regulatory process.

Fletcher also emphasizes the significance of “positive rechallenge” cases, where a child’s adverse reaction to a vaccine is confirmed upon re-exposure. This, he argues, strengthens the case for a causal link between the vaccine and the reaction. Additionally, Fletcher criticizes the lack of attention given to anaphylaxis as a serious adverse effect of vaccines, suggesting that the safety evaluation of vaccines has not been as rigorous as that of other medicinal products.

Wakefield presents a detailed clinical picture of children who developed autism and gastrointestinal symptoms after receiving the MMR vaccine. He describes these cases with vivid clarity, arguing that the evidence points to a causal relationship. One of the most compelling examples is Child PH, whose regression into autism is documented in heartbreaking detail.

The book does not shy away from the controversy surrounding these claims. In a section titled “Coincidence,” Wakefield argues that dismissing the link between vaccines and autism as mere coincidence is not good clinical practice. He cites the case of Bailey Banks, where the U.S. vaccine court ruled that the MMR vaccine caused his autism spectrum disorder, as an example of the potential dangers of ignoring parental reports.

Another contentious issue addressed in the book is the practice of “rechallenge,” where children who have previously reacted to a vaccine are given another dose. Wakefield describes cases where this led to a worsening of symptoms, which he interprets as evidence of a causal relationship. This practice, he argues, underscores the need for a more cautious approach to vaccine administration.

“Callous Disregard” is more than just a book; it is a call to action. Wakefield challenges readers to reconsider the current approach to vaccine safety and to listen to the stories of those affected. While his conclusions remain controversial, the book serves as a reminder that the debate over autism and vaccines is far from settled.

In conclusion, “Callous Disregard” is a provocative addition to the ongoing discussion about the relationship between autism and vaccines. Whether you agree or disagree with Wakefield’s assertions, the book invites readers to engage with the complexities of this issue and to consider the perspectives of those who believe their lives have been impacted by vaccines. As the debate continues, Wakefield’s work stands as a testament to the power of personal stories and the enduring quest for truth.

Watch this video below about Andrew Wakefield’s book “Callous Disregard: Autism and Vaccines—The Truth Behind a Tragedy.”

This video is from the BrightLearn channel on Brighteon.com.